Background: More than half of deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) result from conditions that\ncould be treated with emergency care - an integral component of universal health coverage (UHC) - through\ntimely access to lifesaving interventions.\nMethods: The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to extend UHC to a further 1 billion people by 2023, yet\nevidence supporting improved emergency care coverage is lacking. In this article, we explore four phases of a\nresearch prioritisation setting (RPS) exercise conducted by researchers and stakeholders from South Africa, Egypt,\nNepal, Jamaica, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Colombia, Ethiopia, Iran, Jordan, Malaysia, South Korea and\nPhillipines, USA and UK as a key step in gathering evidence required by policy makers and practitioners for the\nstrengthening of emergency care systems in limited-resource settings.\nResults: The RPS proposed seven priority research questions addressing: identification of context-relevant\nemergency care indicators, barriers to effective emergency care; accuracy and impact of triage tools; potential\nquality improvement via registries; characteristics of people seeking emergency care; best practices for staff training\nand retention; and cost effectiveness of critical care - all within LMICs.\nConclusions: Convened by WHO and facilitated by the University of Sheffield, the Global Emergency Care Research\nNetwork project (GEM-CARN) brought together a coalition of 16 countries to identify research priorities for\nstrengthening emergency care in LMICs. Our article further assesses the quality of the RPS exercise and reviews the\ncurrent evidence supporting the identified priorities.
Loading....